Talk:cloop

Sections in quotations

Discussion moved from User talk:Sgconlaw.

You removed the section “Evidence” from the Kraus quotation at cloop, but you usually add sections to quotation templates. J3133 (talk) 01:59, 30 December 2024 (UTC)

@J3133: did I? Must be an error then. I don't recall seeing any section in that quotation. — Sgconlaw (talk) 18:41, 30 December 2024 (UTC)

Oh, I see there seems to have been some edit conflict when I saved my edits. I didn't notice any section stated in the original version of the quotation before I started editing it. — Sgconlaw (talk) 19:02, 30 December 2024 (UTC)

@J3133: “section Evidence” looks odd. If the section has a letter or number you could specify “section 1 (Evidence)”, otherwise enclosing the section name in quotation marks and moving section behind the name probably makes more sense: ‘“Evidence” section’. — Sgconlaw (talk) 08:43, 31 December 2024 (UTC)

Both original and republished quotations

Discussion moved from User talk:Sgconlaw.

Why is the republished work indicated at cloop (Thomson quotation) if the original is linked? J3133 (talk) 02:04, 30 December 2024 (UTC)

@J3133: probably another mistake on my part. I noticed there are differences between the version of the work published in the journal, and the later book version—for example, the quotation from the work under the verb form of cloop doesn't appear in the journal version, only in the book version. — Sgconlaw (talk) 18:45, 30 December 2024 (UTC)