Talk:cis privilege

RFD discussion: April 2020

The following information passed a request for deletion (permalink).

This discussion is no longer live and is left here as an archive. Please do not modify this conversation, but feel free to discuss its conclusions.

---

cis privilege

The term is classic example of sum-of-parts term. —The Editor's Apprentice (talk) 23:23, 3 April 2020 (UTC)

Well, we do have white privilege. —Suzukaze-c◇◇ 23:26, 3 April 2020 (UTC)

Yeah, I want to close this as the proposer since its covered under the coalmine clause of the CFI. —The Editor's Apprentice (talk) 23:34, 3 April 2020 (UTC)

Withdrawn by the nominator / passes COALMINE, so kept... (although, were it not for that, I would indeed say to delete it as SOP, and probably white privilege, too.) - -sche (discuss) 01:27, 21 April 2020 (UTC)