Talk:chronic Lyme disease
Add topicAppearance
Latest comment: 11 years ago by Dan Polansky in topic chronic Lyme disease
RFD
[edit]data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4bfdd/4bfddeced8c8c38f5b7de9deb23972cd3f11318a" alt=""
The following information passed a request for deletion.
This discussion is no longer live and is left here as an archive. Please do not modify this conversation, but feel free to discuss its conclusions.
Sum of its parts? (plural looks unlikely) SemperBlotto (talk) 08:38, 13 October 2013 (UTC)
- It's a different condition from Lyme disease. It is not long-term untreated Lyme disease infection. -- 76.65.131.217 08:44, 13 October 2013 (UTC)
- The Wikipedia article is pretty well sourced so I imagine this is totally genuine. The thing is, according to evidence it isn't Lyme disease that's chronic in nature, it seems to be a misdiagnosis. I suppose in terms of how it's coined it's Lyme disease that's chronic, but current usage is different to that. Keep. Mglovesfun (talk) 11:53, 13 October 2013 (UTC)
- Keep for that reason. It seems to be a rather poorly named condition! Equinox ◑ 11:55, 13 October 2013 (UTC)
- Keep per the misnomer principle. DCDuring TALK 13:09, 13 October 2013 (UTC)
- Keep for that reason. It seems to be a rather poorly named condition! Equinox ◑ 11:55, 13 October 2013 (UTC)
- RFD kept: no consensus for deletion after months since nomination. --Dan Polansky (talk) 16:33, 1 February 2014 (UTC)