Talk:chattertariat
Latest comment: 3 years ago by Kiwima in topic RFV discussion: July–August 2021
The following information has failed Wiktionary's verification process (permalink).
Failure to be verified means that insufficient eligible citations of this usage have been found, and the entry therefore does not meet Wiktionary inclusion criteria at the present time. We have archived here the disputed information, the verification discussion, and any documentation gathered so far, pending further evidence.
Do not re-add this information to the article without also submitting proof that it meets Wiktionary's criteria for inclusion.
Zero GBooks hits Chuck Entz (talk) 04:48, 27 July 2021 (UTC)
- While I can't find any Gbooks hits, it is reasonably common on the internet. Kiwima (talk) 22:45, 27 July 2021 (UTC)
- I didn't spot anything on e.g. Google News, either (looking only to see whether news sites used it, aware that many don't appear in print). Better attested is chatterati. - -sche (discuss) 03:21, 28 July 2021 (UTC)
- This was a WT:REE request, where someone quoted (without giving a source) “According to numerous polls and a general consensus among the chattertariat, the Republican Party is set to sweep this year’s midterm congressional elections”. Equinox ◑ 10:40, 1 August 2021 (UTC)
RFV-failed Kiwima (talk) 23:04, 27 August 2021 (UTC)