Talk:c/e

RFV

The following information has failed Wiktionary's verification process.

Failure to be verified means that insufficient eligible citations of this usage have been found, and the entry therefore does not meet Wiktionary inclusion criteria at the present time. We have archived here the disputed information, the verification discussion, and any documentation gathered so far, pending further evidence.
Do not re-add this information to the article without also submitting proof that it meets Wiktionary's criteria for inclusion.

---

Even on Wikipedia I have yet to come across this. How high are the chances of it appearing in the wild? -- Liliana • 14:17, 20 July 2012 (UTC)

FWIW, I have seen this used in edit summaries on Wikipedia. That's it. And trying to search for this will be nightmarish. Mglovesfun (talk) 13:15, 21 July 2012 (UTC)

RFV-failed. - -sche (discuss) 22:26, 1 October 2012 (UTC)

Just for the record, the above discussion was about whether this term is used to mean copy edit. - dcljr (talk) 03:09, 21 June 2024 (UTC)