Talk:buck breaking

From Wiktionary, the free dictionary
Latest comment: 3 months ago by 2601:248:5680:E5E0:CD52:DD2B:B8F5:25F4 in topic Downplaying
Jump to navigation Jump to search

RFV discussion: August–September 2021

[edit]

This entry has survived Wiktionary's verification process (permalink).

Please do not re-nominate for verification without comprehensive reasons for doing so.


{{lb|en|archaic|offensive}} The act of first [[flogging]] a [[slave]], and subsequently sexually assaulting or [[rape|raping]] them publicly, in front of other slaves, in order to [[humiliation|humiliate]] them.

Suzukaze-c (talk) 08:40, 24 August 2021 (UTC)Reply

cited. I tweaked the definition, because it was clear from my reading that while it always involved public pain and humiliation, the techniques for achieving this could vary. Sometimes it did not involve the sexual assault. Kiwima (talk) 01:14, 25 August 2021 (UTC)Reply
Conspicous lack of pre-2010 usages and great number of mentions. Is it really archaic? —Suzukaze-c (talk) 01:37, 25 August 2021 (UTC)Reply
I have removed the label since I could find nothing from the 19th or 20th centuries. Possibly a stronger usage note would be advised given the apparently modern coining. DTLHS (talk) 17:35, 25 August 2021 (UTC)Reply
I don't think it's a modern coinage. Just about every use I find seems to refer back to some earlier works that we don't have access to. Kiwima (talk) 07:14, 26 August 2021 (UTC)Reply
Possibly should have a disambiguation note so as to not be confused with break the buck. 70.175.192.217 21:46, 30 August 2021 (UTC)Reply
It probably shouldn't be marked as either "historical" or "offensive", given that the term is most likely a modern invention.__Gamren (talk) 18:35, 1 September 2021 (UTC)Reply
It's clearly historical: it is describing a historical practice, whether or not the specific combination of words is recent. DTLHS (talk) 18:39, 1 September 2021 (UTC)Reply

RFV-passed Kiwima (talk) 22:00, 2 September 2021 (UTC)Reply

Re "it is describing a historical practice": it may not be. We define it only as an "alleged act". See [1]. Equinox 04:15, 17 March 2023 (UTC)Reply

RFV discussion: May 2023–April 2024

[edit]

The following information has failed Wiktionary's verification process (permalink).

Failure to be verified means that insufficient eligible citations of this usage have been found, and the entry therefore does not meet Wiktionary inclusion criteria at the present time. We have archived here the disputed information, the verification discussion, and any documentation gathered so far, pending further evidence.
Do not re-add this information to the article without also submitting proof that it meets Wiktionary's criteria for inclusion.


Newly added sense: Internet slang: "A situation where white males dominate black males in any context." Equinox 11:22, 10 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

RFV-failed and derogatory; deleted. JonsonMaclean (talk) 16:18, 4 April 2024 (UTC)Reply
Its being derogatory is irrelevant. DCDuring (talk) 19:00, 4 April 2024 (UTC)Reply


Downplaying

[edit]

The use of the word alleged makes it seem as if there is a possibility of this not being true when there is proof of this happening. Removing the word alleged would help alleviate the downplay of how serious and real this topic was. 2601:248:5680:E5E0:CD52:DD2B:B8F5:25F4 05:21, 18 July 2024 (UTC)Reply