Talk:bone density
Add topicAppearance
Latest comment: 13 years ago by DAVilla in topic bone density
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/0/03/Green_check.svg/55px-Green_check.svg.png)
The following information passed a request for deletion.
This discussion is no longer live and is left here as an archive. Please do not modify this conversation, but feel free to discuss its conclusions.
It is exactly what it says on the tin. Not idiomatic. -- Liliana • 20:48, 6 November 2011 (UTC)
- This should be kept, it is an important medical term, used to describe the measurement of a person's bone strength. It is not well known for people that don't have arthritis, a great education, or are athletes.Westernstag 03:11, 7 November 2011 (UTC)
- I would keep this, especially as I have improved the definition. SemperBlotto 12:53, 7 November 2011 (UTC)
- Keep per our definition, and also Wikipedia, which says "This medical bone density is not a true physical "density", which would be measured in mass per cubic volume." Of course if both this and our definition are wrong, then I'll reconsider. Mglovesfun (talk) 13:08, 7 November 2011 (UTC)
- With the new definition I agree this can be kept, for reference the old definition said "the density of the bones", so yeah. -- Liliana • 16:17, 7 November 2011 (UTC)
- Keep per our definition, and also Wikipedia, which says "This medical bone density is not a true physical "density", which would be measured in mass per cubic volume." Of course if both this and our definition are wrong, then I'll reconsider. Mglovesfun (talk) 13:08, 7 November 2011 (UTC)