Talk:bly

@Gamren, could you please provide IPA for the Danish entry here? —Μετάknowledge^{discuss/deeds} 00:16, 15 November 2017 (UTC)

@Metaknowledge That would be [ˈb̥lyːˀ] in the notation we've been using, and [ˈblyːˀ] in the simplified notation that Mr KEBAB did here. I'm not sure which I prefer, but if we go for the new notation, we should update existing entries (should be mostly just simple substitution). If we choose to continue using the old, finer notation, we should make a page here on WT explaining that notation (This might be useful).__Gamren (talk) 08:16, 15 November 2017 (UTC)

Thank you. That needs to be determined by discussion, the results of which should end up at WT:ADA. In the mean time, I'll stick with the old system. —Μετάknowledge^{discuss/deeds} 08:20, 15 November 2017 (UTC)

@Metaknowledge Also, is there a reason you want IPA for this in particular? Most entries don't have it.__Gamren (talk) 08:30, 15 November 2017 (UTC)

It was nominated for FWOTD. If you have any better suggestions for Danish (or any other language), be sure to nominate them! —Μετάknowledge^{discuss/deeds} 16:30, 15 November 2017 (UTC)

@Gamren, and one of the senses has a bunch of question marks on its headword line. —Μετάknowledge^{discuss/deeds} 01:51, 17 November 2017 (UTC)

@Metaknowledge I apparently did that, though I can't remember it. Anyway, I think it is uninflected and genderless.__Gamren (talk) 07:09, 17 November 2017 (UTC)

@Metaknowledge La Nuova Idea (mia) is adding what looks like DDO-style pronunciations. This may be a good time for that discussion. I don't really care myself.__Gamren (talk) 12:11, 10 March 2018 (UTC)