Talk:aquastor
Add topicAppearance
Latest comment: 4 years ago by Kiwima in topic RFV discussion: November–December 2020
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4bfdd/4bfddeced8c8c38f5b7de9deb23972cd3f11318a" alt=""
This entry has survived Wiktionary's verification process (permalink).
Please do not re-nominate for verification without comprehensive reasons for doing so.
Even with a quote, I'm still having a hard time pinpointing what it actually means. OneLook gave me nada. --Robbie SWE (talk) 18:12, 27 November 2020 (UTC)
- It's science fiction, the word was invented for the book. DTLHS (talk) 18:17, 27 November 2020 (UTC)
- Not just science fiction. It apparently goes back to Paracelsus, so it appears in a few works discussing his metaphysical theories. Chuck Entz (talk) 19:24, 27 November 2020 (UTC)
- @Robbie SWE: I added quotations, including one the definition uses. J3133 (talk) 18:45, 27 November 2020 (UTC)
- As I write this the first four quotations are not independent, all being by Wolfe or about his writing. We need one more. Vox Sciurorum (talk) 19:26, 27 November 2020 (UTC)
- @Vox Sciurorum: I added two more. J3133 (talk) 21:23, 27 November 2020 (UTC)
- Also: WT:FICTION. --2003:DE:371B:BD35:3428:E848:3D42:39D7 20:34, 27 November 2020 (UTC)
- If Chuck is right that it goes back to Paracelsus, I don't think fiction applies. Anyone want to add an etymology? - -sche (discuss) 00:43, 5 December 2020 (UTC)
- If Storlie is independent of Wolfe(?), that's two citations, and Black's citation (referencing Paracelsus) is independent of those (although it capitalizes the term), and Wittine also seems independent; that seems like enough citations.
Regarding FICTION: I think that if 3+ unconnected fiction writers use a term in 3+ unconnected fictional universes, like transmat, the term passes FICTION and is the kind of thing labels like{{lb|en|fiction}}
,{{lb|en|science fiction}}
and{{lb|en|fantasy}}
exist to label, although the guideline could use cleanup to make it clearer whether this is or is not the case. - -sche (discuss) 03:35, 6 December 2020 (UTC) - I added an
18831899 use which may be the oldest English use. I consider this cited. I need to review some older foreign uses, also related to Paracelsus like the 1891 and 2013 mentions, but that's etymology and history. Vox Sciurorum (talk) 15:56, 6 December 2020 (UTC)- I can't find a searchable text of Paracelsus' works, so the trail ends with a pair of 19th century German lists of his coinages, both giving "Aquastor — ein täuschendes Gesicht" (= doppelganger?). Vox Sciurorum (talk) 21:28, 6 December 2020 (UTC)
- A "Rochi le Baillif Edelphi Medici Dictionariolum vocum quibus in suis Scriptis uſus eſt Paracelsus" (page 13 of a "Philippi Theophrasti Paracelsi"), included in the back of a 1658(?) Aureoli Philippi Theophrasti Paracelsi Bombast ab Hohenheim (here), has: "Aquastor, eſt viſio quædam rem aliquam re-preſentans qua reuera non eſt." Unless it's in an inflected form I didn't check, I don't spot the word elsewhere in that book or in other old Latin works, though. - -sche (discuss) 22:05, 6 December 2020 (UTC)
- I can't find a searchable text of Paracelsus' works, so the trail ends with a pair of 19th century German lists of his coinages, both giving "Aquastor — ein täuschendes Gesicht" (= doppelganger?). Vox Sciurorum (talk) 21:28, 6 December 2020 (UTC)
RFV-passed Kiwima (talk) 19:29, 14 December 2020 (UTC)