Talk:anomalous

RFD

The following discussion has been moved from Wiktionary:Requests for deletion.

This discussion is no longer live and is left here as an archive. Please do not modify this conversation, but feel free to discuss its conclusions.

---

anomalous

Sense: "Equivocal". tagged as needing clarification. I have added two other senses. The three unmarked senses seem to cover it AFAIK. DCDuring TALK 20:36, 15 July 2011 (UTC)

Moved to WT:RfV#anomalous. DCDuring TALK 12:44, 23 July 2011 (UTC)

RFV discussion: July 2011–February 2012

The following information has failed Wiktionary's verification process (permalink).

Failure to be verified means that insufficient eligible citations of this usage have been found, and the entry therefore does not meet Wiktionary inclusion criteria at the present time. We have archived here the disputed information, the verification discussion, and any documentation gathered so far, pending further evidence.
Do not re-add this information to the article without also submitting proof that it meets Wiktionary's criteria for inclusion.

---

anomalous

Rfv-sense: equivocal. DCDuring TALK 12:45, 23 July 2011 (UTC)

• Weird. Is someone getting confused with (deprecated template usage) analogous? Ƿidsiþ 12:53, 23 July 2011 (UTC)

  Oh, never mind. I thought you said equivalent. Ƿidsiþ 12:55, 23 July 2011 (UTC)

Deleted. - -sche (discuss) 06:21, 22 February 2012 (UTC)