Talk:animadversiveness

From Wiktionary, the free dictionary
Latest comment: 13 years ago by Doremítzwr in topic RFV discussion
Jump to navigation Jump to search

RFV discussion

[edit]

The following information has failed Wiktionary's verification process.

Failure to be verified means that insufficient eligible citations of this usage have been found, and the entry therefore does not meet Wiktionary inclusion criteria at the present time. We have archived here the disputed information, the verification discussion, and any documentation gathered so far, pending further evidence.
Do not re-add this information to the article without also submitting proof that it meets Wiktionary's criteria for inclusion.


Only in dictionaries. Nadando 21:12, 28 November 2010 (UTC)Reply

Move to rfd. Animadversion is the real word. -- Ghost of WikiPedant 23:38, 28 November 2010 (UTC)Reply
If it doesn't exist, why would it be better at rfd than here? Mglovesfun (talk) 23:46, 28 November 2010 (UTC)Reply
Because it is in dictionaries. The OED lists it, but has no quotations (just one lonesome sort-of attestation: "1731 in Bailey"). -- Ghost of WikiPedant 23:50, 28 November 2010 (UTC)Reply
On rfd it will just be a 'vote' on whether to allow it, while here it will fail, if what you say is true, because unattested. Mglovesfun (talk) 23:59, 28 November 2010 (UTC)Reply
Move to Appendix:English dictionary-only terms. — Raifʻhār Doremítzwr ~ (U · T · C) ~ 16:35, 29 November 2010 (UTC)Reply
May as well give it a month first though, right? Mglovesfun (talk) 19:02, 29 November 2010 (UTC)Reply
Sure. — Raifʻhār Doremítzwr ~ (U · T · C) ~ 16:01, 30 November 2010 (UTC)Reply
RFV failed. — Raifʻhār Doremítzwr ~ (U · T · C) ~ 02:12, 2 January 2011 (UTC)Reply