Talk:animadversiveness

RFV discussion

The following information has failed Wiktionary's verification process.

Failure to be verified means that insufficient eligible citations of this usage have been found, and the entry therefore does not meet Wiktionary inclusion criteria at the present time. We have archived here the disputed information, the verification discussion, and any documentation gathered so far, pending further evidence.
Do not re-add this information to the article without also submitting proof that it meets Wiktionary's criteria for inclusion.

---

Only in dictionaries. Nadando 21:12, 28 November 2010 (UTC)

Move to rfd. Animadversion is the real word. -- Ghost of WikiPedant 23:38, 28 November 2010 (UTC)

If it doesn't exist, why would it be better at rfd than here? Mglovesfun (talk) 23:46, 28 November 2010 (UTC)

Because it is in dictionaries. The OED lists it, but has no quotations (just one lonesome sort-of attestation: "1731 in Bailey"). -- Ghost of WikiPedant 23:50, 28 November 2010 (UTC)

On rfd it will just be a 'vote' on whether to allow it, while here it will fail, if what you say is true, because unattested. Mglovesfun (talk) 23:59, 28 November 2010 (UTC)

Move to Appendix:English dictionary-only terms. — Raifʻhār Doremítzwr ~ (U · T · C) ~ 16:35, 29 November 2010 (UTC)

May as well give it a month first though, right? Mglovesfun (talk) 19:02, 29 November 2010 (UTC)

Sure. — Raifʻhār Doremítzwr ~ (U · T · C) ~ 16:01, 30 November 2010 (UTC)

RFV failed. — Raifʻhār Doremítzwr ~ (U · T · C) ~ 02:12, 2 January 2011 (UTC)