Talk:ailihphilia
The following information has failed Wiktionary's verification process.
Failure to be verified means that insufficient eligible citations of this usage have been found, and the entry therefore does not meet Wiktionary inclusion criteria at the present time. We have archived here the disputed information, the verification discussion, and any documentation gathered so far, pending further evidence.
Do not re-add this information to the article without also submitting proof that it meets Wiktionary's criteria for inclusion.
Usual garbage, I just want to check before deleting. Mglovesfun (talk) 13:20, 7 October 2009 (UTC)
- In fairness this gets six hits on Google Books, two of which are usable (if you allow Ailihphilia). So I think it merits at the very least a whole month. Mglovesfun (talk) 15:56, 11 October 2009 (UTC)
- Yeah, [1], [2], [3], and [4] all definitely use it, whilst this one is unclear. It satisfies the CFI, but the way it’s used clearly requires that it be marked as a nonce word. † ﴾(u):Raifʻhār (t):Doremítzwr﴿ 18:24, 11 October 2009 (UTC)
RFV failed, entry deleted. I clicked on Doremítzwr's links, and despite his statement that it satisfies the CFI, I'm not convinced. I did put one of them on the citations-page, though. —RuakhTALK 07:55, 12 July 2010 (UTC)