Talk:access modifier

The following information passed a request for deletion.

This discussion is no longer live and is left here as an archive. Please do not modify this conversation, but feel free to discuss its conclusions.

Shockingly, an access specifier specifies access. I'm going to stop adding entries now, because I feel as if I'm spamming RFD, but I will finish by noting that sae1962 is a prodigious editor - these are only the SoP entries since October 15, and they are a relatively small portion of a sea of Turkish and German edits which look to be of generally good quality. It would be great if all his efforts were directed towards those entries. Furius (talk) 01:44, 2 December 2012 (UTC)Reply

A list of users' login passwords also specifies access, but is not an access specifier. Equinox ◑ 01:50, 2 December 2012 (UTC)Reply

In the correct context (object-oriented language grammar), there is no ambiguity. --Wiki Tiki 89 09:17, 2 December 2012 (UTC)Reply

Kept, no consensus to delete. bd2412 T 16:53, 3 September 2013 (UTC)Reply