Talk:abempty
Add topicLatest comment: 9 months ago by Equinox in topic RFV discussion: May 2024
The following information has failed Wiktionary's verification process (permalink).
Failure to be verified means that insufficient eligible citations of this usage have been found, and the entry therefore does not meet Wiktionary inclusion criteria at the present time. We have archived here the disputed information, the verification discussion, and any documentation gathered so far, pending further evidence.
Do not re-add this information to the article without also submitting proof that it meets Wiktionary's criteria for inclusion.
A token used in one BNF grammar. — SURJECTION / T / C / L / 17:45, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
- Speedied: the linked document showed it wasn't a Wiktionary-includable term, and the entry seemed careless anyway (e.g. "more abempty, most abempty"). Equinox ◑ 09:32, 27 May 2024 (UTC)