Talk:Upsaroka
Add topicAppearance
Latest comment: 11 years ago by Ruakh in topic Upsaroka
Deletion debate
[edit]The following information passed a request for deletion.
This discussion is no longer live and is left here as an archive. Please do not modify this conversation, but feel free to discuss its conclusions.
This spelling was imported from the 1913 websters and a google search shows nothing under this spelling. Absaroka seems to be the correct spelling. Speednat (talk) 07:56, 13 July 2012 (UTC)
- First of all, when you say "a google search shows...", that's a strong hint that this belongs at rfv, since the question seems to be not that there's something inherently wrong with it, such as being sum-of-parts or a brand name, but that it's not used. To save that step, though, I should mention that there are more than enough examples in Google books, including one in a work of Edgar Allen Poe. None of those seem to be less than a century old, so it should be marked obsolete or archaic and converted to an "alternative spelling of" entry. Chuck Entz (talk) 15:33, 13 July 2012 (UTC)
- I agree with everything Chuck just said. —Angr 17:56, 13 July 2012 (UTC)
- Thanks for the weigh-in. I will fix it if it hasn't already been alt form'ed. Speednat (talk) 20:11, 13 July 2012 (UTC)
- I agree with everything Chuck just said. —Angr 17:56, 13 July 2012 (UTC)
- Keep, now those changes have been made (thank you, Speednat). — This unsigned comment was added by 129.125.102.126 (talk) at 20:51, 17 October 2012 (UTC).