Talk:Trumphobia

RFV discussion: October 2018

This entry has survived Wiktionary's verification process (permalink).

Please do not re-nominate for verification without comprehensive reasons for doing so.

---

Trumphobia

Only the first cite is durably archived (the second is a broken link). Also, both this and Trumphobic or Trumpophobic should probably be made into hotwords. Kiwima (talk) 22:49, 15 October 2018 (UTC)

Ok, I added some more cites for this. They span more than a year, so not a hotword, but I am not sure about the durably archived thing. Can someone else weigh in here? Kiwima (talk) 23:00, 15 October 2018 (UTC)

I would say News 24 and Disabled Veterans don't look durably archived. The print editions of The Australian and The Wall Street Journal are, though I can't tell if these articles appeared in the print editions. —Granger (talk · contribs) 23:56, 15 October 2018 (UTC)

RFV-passed Kiwima (talk) 11:20, 29 October 2018 (UTC)

Unstriking. Are there three durably archived citations here? It seems to me that we have two (the two Usenet citations). Can anyone confirm that any of the news citations ever appeared in print? —Granger (talk · contribs) 13:51, 29 October 2018 (UTC)

The Wall Street Journal. Re-striking. Kiwima (talk) 20:50, 29 October 2018 (UTC)

Unstriking again. It is really poor form and, frankly, rude to continually try to close a discussion when there are still open objections being discussed. On what basis did you determine that the Wall Street Journal article appeared in print? —Granger (talk · contribs) 00:40, 30 October 2018 (UTC)

A visit to the local library. I apologise for appearing rude. Kiwima (talk) 00:46, 30 October 2018 (UTC)

Thanks for the clarification, and no worries. In that case, I have no more objections to closing the discussion. —Granger (talk · contribs) 00:55, 30 October 2018 (UTC)

(Restriking accordingly.) —Granger (talk · contribs) 02:01, 30 October 2018 (UTC)