Talk:Rep. of Iraq
Latest comment: 4 years ago by TheDaveRoss in topic RFD discussion: March 2019–April 2020
The following discussion has been moved from Wiktionary:Requests for deletion (permalink).
This discussion is no longer live and is left here as an archive. Please do not modify this conversation, but feel free to discuss its conclusions.
Rep. of Iraq, Rep. of Korea, Rep. of Nicaragua, and so on… the meanings are probably obvious enough. I guess that the entries might still work as redirects but I’m fine with somebody deleting them. — (((Romanophile))) ♞ (contributions) 16:13, 23 March 2019 (UTC)
- Should it be in RFDO? DonnanZ (talk) 12:18, 24 March 2019 (UTC)
- "Special:WhatLinksHere" is just a way of linking to the entries considered for deletion, not something to be deleted itself. Besides, it's a feature of the system, so it couldn't be deleted, anyway. Chuck Entz (talk) 12:37, 24 March 2019 (UTC)
- Oh, I see. In that case, perhaps they should be individual RFDs. DonnanZ (talk) 13:31, 24 March 2019 (UTC)
- "Special:WhatLinksHere" is just a way of linking to the entries considered for deletion, not something to be deleted itself. Besides, it's a feature of the system, so it couldn't be deleted, anyway. Chuck Entz (talk) 12:37, 24 March 2019 (UTC)
- There are 30 such entries. Deleting some and leaving some others does not make much sense. Either we delete all, or we keep all. --Lambiam 18:32, 24 March 2019 (UTC)
- IMO this seems comparable to Talk:eatin' for two (2011) and Talk:eatin' like a bird (2018), which were both deleted. Redirect or delete, IMO: personally I don't see the harm in leaving redirects, though consistency would have us delete them altogether. - -sche (discuss) 21:03, 28 March 2019 (UTC)
- Redirected - TheDaveRoss 13:06, 1 April 2020 (UTC)