Talk:Pornhub

RFD discussion: October–December 2024

The following information passed a request for deletion (permalink).

This discussion is no longer live and is left here as an archive. Please do not modify this conversation, but feel free to discuss its conclusions.

---

Pornhub

As XVideos above. PUC – 19:33, 2 October 2024 (UTC)

Why would we keep the sosh meed (Twitter, Discord etc) but not this? My reading of WT:BRAND suggests that popular products (websites are products) are chill with their own entries since they are very familiar and widely-used, like "John Doe is on Facebook" or "She jotted it down on her iPhone before leaving the café". Pornhub is taboo but still used in this way as the most-visited website, just slightly less than some social media but more than others we have entries for. Unless I am mistaken on my reading of the policy? By the XVideos rationale all our social media entries would have to be deleted as well (I am vaguely in favour of keeping them based on the WT:BRAND logic). LunaEatsTuna (talk) 22:07, 2 October 2024 (UTC)

Added some quotes (Dec 2017, 2019, 2020, Jan 2024) that probably qualify under WT:BRAND. Einstein2 (talk) 01:28, 3 October 2024 (UTC)

This should be kept because of the noun sense by default. AG202 (talk) 13:28, 3 October 2024 (UTC)

Keep per above. Fay Freak (talk) 15:01, 3 October 2024 (UTC)

Delete the proper noun sense, which can be stated in the etymology for the figurative sense. Inqilābī 17:06, 6 October 2024 (UTC)

Delete the proper noun sense, as the quotations do not satisfy WT:BRAND. — Sgconlaw (talk) 21:09, 14 October 2024 (UTC)

@Sgconlaw What about quotes 3–6? They are independent in their usage and they span three years. Is there a reason they do not satisfy BRAND? LunaEatsTuna (talk) 21:19, 14 October 2024 (UTC)

• RFD-kept. Svartava2 (talk) 18:49, 26 December 2024 (UTC)