Talk:Microsoftian
Add topicRequest for verification
[edit]
The following information has failed Wiktionary's verification process.
Failure to be verified means that insufficient eligible citations of this usage have been found, and the entry therefore does not meet Wiktionary inclusion criteria at the present time. We have archived here the disputed information, the verification discussion, and any documentation gathered so far, pending further evidence.
Do not re-add this information to the article without also submitting proof that it meets Wiktionary's criteria for inclusion.
"Of poor quality; displaying an inability to function or operate." "Resolved in an untimely manner." Equinox ◑ 00:24, 4 January 2010 (UTC)
- Delete. google books:"Microsoftian" suggests that this term has quite a range of senses, the only common factor being that they all mean "characteristic of Microsoft". A fair number are rather derisive, alluding to the (purportedly) illogical organization of Microsoft user interfaces, to a (purported) tendency at Microsoft to respond unhelpfully to media queries, and so on, but there's no one common derisive sense. —RuakhTALK 14:59, 4 January 2010 (UTC)
- Delete, fatuous entry. Mglovesfun (talk) 17:56, 4 January 2010 (UTC)
Senses removed. Mglovesfun (talk) 06:23, 5 January 2010 (UTC)
The following discussion has been moved from Wiktionary:Requests for verification (permalink).
This discussion is no longer live and is left here as an archive. Please do not modify this conversation, but feel free to discuss its conclusions.
RFV-sense faulty, not functioning, etc. See Talk:Microsoftian, which suggests this sense was removed before but then re-added (who did this? why?). The single citation could just as well fit under the primary sense (relating to Microsoft). Equinox ◑ 01:45, 21 August 2012 (UTC)
- Removed in this edit [1], re-added in this one [2] by an editor who has since been blocked. - -sche (discuss) 02:58, 21 August 2012 (UTC)
- I have removed the sense. It previously failed RFV and should not have been re-added without three clear citations. - -sche (discuss) 22:06, 21 August 2012 (UTC)