Talk:Lund

an unincorporated community in California??

The criteria for inclusion say:

A name should be included if it is used attributively, with a widely understood meaning. For example: New York is included because "New York" is used attributively in phrases like "New York delicatessen", to describe a particular sort of delicatessen. A person or place name that is not used attributively (and that is not a word that otherwise should be included) should not be included. Lower Hampton, Empire State Building, and George Walker Bush thus should not be included. Similarly, whilst Jefferson (an attested family name word with an etymology that Wiktionary can discuss) and Jeffersonian (an adjective) should be included, Thomas Jefferson (which isn’t used attributively) should not.

I imagine most of the senses of Lund are thus not to be included.—msh210℠ 18:35, 6 January 2009 (UTC)

My mistake. The English section should never have been. --Leif Runenritzer 08:06, 7 January 2009 (UTC)

Well, as I recall, one of the English senses was "a surname", and we do include those (preferably with some more information than justthat it's a surname). See WT:CFI.—msh210℠ 17:11, 7 January 2009 (UTC)