Jump to content

Talk:London-centric

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wiktionary, the free dictionary
Latest comment: 2 years ago by GreyishWorm in topic RFD discussion: September–October 2022

RFD discussion: September–October 2022

[edit]

The following information passed a request for deletion (permalink).

This discussion is no longer live and is left here as an archive. Please do not modify this conversation, but feel free to discuss its conclusions.


SOP. Banglacentric and Croatocentric are saved by the WT:COALMINE rule. Shi'a-centric isn't, but already passed an RFD, despite nobody actually voting to keep (Widsith (talkcontribs) saying keep single word. If attested. GreyishWorm (talk) 20:57, 30 September 2022 (UTC)Reply

Well, Londoncentric would solve your "problem" as used by the Evening Standard [1]. Doesn't look too bad, no worse than Londonesque. Keep. DonnanZ (talk) 03:32, 1 October 2022 (UTC)Reply
With the frequent changes in user name, I doubt that such a ban would work. DonnanZ (talk) 14:03, 1 October 2022 (UTC)Reply
It could. GreyishWorm reports themselves to be Wonderfool. We could just close the RFD as, speedy-kept: nominated by sockmaster Wonderfool. That would require something like proto-consensus, of course. --Dan Polansky (talk) 09:47, 2 October 2022 (UTC)Reply
I'd be happy for a ban for Wonderfool on RFD! They are already unofficially banned from voting (although curiously, not from starting and closing votes) GreyishWorm (talk) 10:49, 2 October 2022 (UTC)Reply
STRONG Keep This is very much a word, there are no shortage of hits on GoogleBooks, with or without a hyphen, as well as the Evening Standard quote mentioned above being a valid cite. The only problem with this very widely used word is that no one has yet got around to creating the corresponding word Londoncentrism. --Overlordnat1 (talk) 08:17, 1 October 2022 (UTC)Reply