Talk:Kotzefresser
Add topicLatest comment: 7 years ago by Hyperhero
In case that anybody wants to see evidence for the existence of this word:
- Else Buschheuer: Venus (2013)
- Christoph Treutwein: Der Sohn des Papstes (2016)
- Online-Filmdatenbank: Eine Kritik von "die hinkende Hafenhoe"
--Hyperhero (talk) 18:18, 28 July 2017 (UTC)
- That's what the Citations page is for, though you would need to format them properly (see WT:CITE for more). The first two are the only ones that would meet the requirements of our Criteria for inclusion as evidence of existence: websites aren't durably archived. Chuck Entz (talk) 21:12, 28 July 2017 (UTC)
- Dear Chuck Entz, thanks for the information. I now added the citations at Citations:Kotzefresser. I also used the website as a source, but I added a link to the archived version at the Internet-archive. Is it acceptable this way? --Hyperhero (talk) 22:48, 28 July 2017 (UTC)
- Sadly, no. The Internet Archive has a policy that the current owner of a website can have its history removed from the archive. There's been a great deal of discussion about this, but the consensus is that the Internet Archive doesn't qualify as durably archived for the purposes of our CFI. Chuck Entz (talk) 23:58, 28 July 2017 (UTC)
- Thanks for the information. I added an additional citation (DE:BUG Elektronische Lebensaspekte 125, Sept. 2008) which cites a journal. So now we have at least three citations from durably archived sources.--Hyperhero (talk) 02:48, 30 July 2017 (UTC)
- Sadly, no. The Internet Archive has a policy that the current owner of a website can have its history removed from the archive. There's been a great deal of discussion about this, but the consensus is that the Internet Archive doesn't qualify as durably archived for the purposes of our CFI. Chuck Entz (talk) 23:58, 28 July 2017 (UTC)
- Dear Chuck Entz, thanks for the information. I now added the citations at Citations:Kotzefresser. I also used the website as a source, but I added a link to the archived version at the Internet-archive. Is it acceptable this way? --Hyperhero (talk) 22:48, 28 July 2017 (UTC)