Talk:General Secretary
Latest comment: 9 years ago by BD2412 in topic General Secretary
The following information passed a request for deletion.
This discussion is no longer live and is left here as an archive. Please do not modify this conversation, but feel free to discuss its conclusions.
This is a really terrible entry that somehow slipped under the radar. I was about to stick an RFC on it when I realised that it might not even be entry-worthy in the first place, although if it is, two of the definitions need to go. —Μετάknowledgediscuss/deeds 04:39, 12 January 2015 (UTC)
- What definitions? All I see is a list of facts about General Secretaries, which seem to be specific to Communist entities. This same text appears in the Wikipedia article, but not as numbered items. Chuck Entz (talk) 06:47, 12 January 2015 (UTC)
- Yes, would probably be OK if the three explanations were replaced by an actual definition. SemperBlotto (talk) 07:57, 12 January 2015 (UTC)
- I've had a go at cleaning it up. Smurrayinchester (talk) 14:46, 12 January 2015 (UTC)
- Keep as reworded: secretary as head of a party is a novel sense; generally we think of secretaries as the people in the office typing stuff up. Purplebackpack89 15:04, 12 January 2015 (UTC)
Kept as reworded. bd2412 T 19:34, 6 February 2015 (UTC)