Talk:Gayreek

RFV discussion: September 2022

This entry has survived Wiktionary's verification process (permalink).

Please do not re-nominate for verification without comprehensive reasons for doing so.

---

Gayreek

This entry, or one or more of its senses, has been nominated as derogatory pursuant to WT:DEROGATORY. It may be speedily deleted if it does not have at least three quotations meeting the attestation requirements within two weeks of the nomination date, that is, by 26 September 2022.

98.170.164.88 02:14, 13 September 2022 (UTC)

Added three twitter cites; not the best though. The Twitter 'gayreek' corpus is not of particularly high quality but that's maybe not so surprising. In any case it's a word I've heard. Winthrop23 (talk) 12:43, 13 September 2022 (UTC)

Cited. Binarystep (talk) 07:04, 16 September 2022 (UTC)

On hold pending a resolution of the online sources issue. Also, this would only pass as a {{hot word}}. This, that and the other (talk) 12:02, 25 September 2022 (UTC)

@This, that and the other: I think you replied to the wrong RFV. Three of the citations are from Usenet. Binarystep (talk) 09:10, 26 September 2022 (UTC)

@Binarystep I only looked in the entry, not in the citations page. Between this RFV and the one above, it seems like I wasn't doing too well yesterday... This, that and the other (talk) 09:33, 26 September 2022 (UTC)

RFV-passed This, that and the other (talk) 09:33, 26 September 2022 (UTC)