Talk:Gänseliesel

From Wiktionary, the free dictionary
Latest comment: 6 years ago by P5Nd2 in topic Gänseliesel
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Someone with knowledge should enter this.

RFV

[edit]

This entry has survived Wiktionary's verification process.

Please do not re-nominate for verification without comprehensive reasons for doing so.


Gänseliesel

[edit]

This is a famous landwark in Germany (w:Gänseliesel). Any citations would be appreciated. --Keene 17:18, 31 May 2007 (UTC)Reply

There are articles on it in English and German Wikipedias (w:Gänseliesel). —Stephen 19:36, 31 May 2007 (UTC)Reply
  • 1974: Psychological Research, published by EBSCO Publishing
    Ich sehe etwas Schwarzes, es könnte die Gänseliesel sein.
    (translation) I see something black, it looks like–perhaps the Gänseliesel. (response to a Rorschach ink blot test)
Beobach972 19:05, 2 June 2007 (UTC)Reply
  • 1979: Horst Schlötelburg, Briefe nach jenseits.
  • Weibern in die Schlüpfer faßt, der sollte hier nicht sitzen wie die Gänseliesel am Brunnen.

Beobach972 19:05, 2 June 2007 (UTC)Reply

rfvpassed for German Cynewulf 19:23, 17 October 2007 (UTC)Reply


October 2017 RFD

[edit]

The following information passed a request for deletion.

This discussion is no longer live and is left here as an archive. Please do not modify this conversation, but feel free to discuss its conclusions.


Gänseliesel

[edit]

WF RFV'd it years ago, it passed. Now it's RFD time. --P5Nd2 (talk) 08:54, 15 October 2017 (UTC)Reply

Why? Being a proper noun can't be a reason; being a proper noun of a thing can't be either (else also e.g. Statue of Liberty would have to be deleted). Somewhat misleading header and missing inflection section can't be too (which would be a matter of WT:RFC). It could still be a matter of RFV though, requiring three cites for each gender. (If there are plenty of cites for feminine gender and just the one in the entry for neuter gender, than neuter gender isn't properly attested and could be an error.) -84.161.12.35 09:38, 15 October 2017 (UTC)Reply