Talk:Forever Alone

RFV

The following information has failed Wiktionary's verification process.

Failure to be verified means that insufficient eligible citations of this usage have been found, and the entry therefore does not meet Wiktionary inclusion criteria at the present time. We have archived here the disputed information, the verification discussion, and any documentation gathered so far, pending further evidence.
Do not re-add this information to the article without also submitting proof that it meets Wiktionary's criteria for inclusion.

---

Recent internet meme, won't find citations spanning three years. Nadando 22:23, 15 February 2011 (UTC)

Is this the kind of thing we should have anyway? It's a specific name of a character. It's like having the names of toys or pop stars. Equinox ◑ 16:19, 16 February 2011 (UTC)

Delete per Nadando, preferably after checking attestability, and hopefully undelete eventually per Wiktionary's bureucracy.

Equinox, Forever Alone is actually just a drawing; it's simply a two-dimensional work like Mona Lisa. Both Forever Alone and Mona Lisa, however, can be rationalized into fictional characters and possibly defined as so, if we can find citations such as in this hypothetical joke: "Mona Lisa, the Vitruvian Man and the Statue of Liberty go to a bar..." --Daniel. 16:32, 16 February 2011 (UTC)

I don't see how being in a joke helps, and I don't think Mona Lisa (a specific named item, in this case a painting, without generic meaning) belongs in a dictionary. (Ignoring the generic noun sense, which I haven't come across personally and only just noticed in the entry.) Equinox ◑ 22:10, 16 February 2011 (UTC)

Failed RFV, still no citations. Equinox ◑ 01:39, 9 July 2011 (UTC)