Talk:Foghorn Leghorn
Add topic
The following information passed a request for deletion.
This discussion is no longer live and is left here as an archive. Please do not modify this conversation, but feel free to discuss its conclusions.
As above. --Keene 07:38, 14 May 2007 (UTC)
- Keep, used attibutively to describe voices/accents [1]. Kappa 07:47, 14 May 2007 (UTC)
The following information has failed Wiktionary's verification process (permalink).
Failure to be verified means that insufficient eligible citations of this usage have been found, and the entry therefore does not meet Wiktionary inclusion criteria at the present time. We have archived here the disputed information, the verification discussion, and any documentation gathered so far, pending further evidence.
Do not re-add this information to the article without also submitting proof that it meets Wiktionary's criteria for inclusion.
"(trademark) A fictional, large, anthropomorphic rooster who is a character of Looney Tunes and Merrie Melodies." Needs to meet WT:BRAND. Equinox ◑ 19:52, 18 August 2011 (UTC)
- This and Fluffy (and the others) also need to meet WT:FICTION, right? - -sche (discuss) 20:41, 18 August 2011 (UTC)
- In what sense are these "physical products"? Fugyoo 10:41, 20 August 2011 (UTC)
- Fugyoo is right here, these need to meet WT:FICTION but WT:BRAND doesn't apply. I'd be quite happy just to rfd all of these. Mglovesfun (talk) 11:19, 20 August 2011 (UTC)
- I'll have to get right on entering the names of all companies in the world that do not provide physical products, their product line being limited to services. Then there are all of their service names and the service names used by companies that also have physical products. We are sadly very deficient in our coverage of these, apparently due to a longstanding misreading of WT:BRAND.
- Almost any fictional character could have a service mark. As I am not an intellectual property attorney or expert, I am not sure whether obtaining license revenues from the sale of merchandise associated with the character requires that there also be a trademark. DCDuring TALK 11:39, 20 August 2011 (UTC)
- Fugyoo is right here, these need to meet WT:FICTION but WT:BRAND doesn't apply. I'd be quite happy just to rfd all of these. Mglovesfun (talk) 11:19, 20 August 2011 (UTC)
- In what sense are these "physical products"? Fugyoo 10:41, 20 August 2011 (UTC)
- Regarding whether or not WT:BRAND applies: note this previous discussion. Regarding trademark requirements, we could ask User:BD2412. - -sche (discuss) 22:04, 20 August 2011 (UTC)
- RFV-failed. - -sche (discuss) 06:08, 12 October 2011 (UTC)