Talk:European Stability Mechanism
Add topicLatest comment: 2 years ago by Fytcha in topic RFD discussion: March–July 2022
The following information passed a request for deletion (permalink).
This discussion is no longer live and is left here as an archive. Please do not modify this conversation, but feel free to discuss its conclusions.
Organizations. ·~ dictátor·mundꟾ 19:57, 3 March 2022 (UTC)
- For most of these, but especially European Council and Council of Europe, what rule do they break at WT:CFI? By the reading you're providing, United Nations & European Union could be deleted in the future, so I'm confused as to where the line is. The part about Wiktionary being an encyclopedia states that it's for the clarification of definitions rather than entries, and then goes on to talk about people and places, which most of these are not. European Cooperative Society & European Company are straight up nouns, not even the names of single entities. Weak keep for the proper nouns excluding European Council & Council of Europe, keep for those two, and strong keep for the nouns until this is at least thoroughly clarified. AG202 (talk) 18:57, 5 March 2022 (UTC)
- @AG202: What about WT:COMPANY? Plus, Wiktionary is not an encyclopedia. ·~ dictátor·mundꟾ 12:19, 7 March 2022 (UTC)
- Keep them all. No convincing reason has been given for deletion of this job lot. DonnanZ (talk) 08:55, 7 March 2022 (UTC)
- Keep, there is no rule against proper nouns and I'm not sure why else these would be deleted. AllenY99 (talk) 08:19, 8 March 2022 (UTC)
- Keep In general, I think entries for international organisations are helpful. John Cross (talk) 05:51, 27 May 2022 (UTC)
- Keep, we seek to apply consistent criteria here, Wiktionary talk:Votes/2022-06/Updating CFI for names of organizations. Fay Freak (talk) 19:44, 21 June 2022 (UTC)
RFD-kept. — Fytcha〈 T | L | C 〉 12:51, 3 July 2022 (UTC)