Talk:Commons

RFV discussion: July 2011–March 2012

The following information has failed Wiktionary's verification process (permalink).

Failure to be verified means that insufficient eligible citations of this usage have been found, and the entry therefore does not meet Wiktionary inclusion criteria at the present time. We have archived here the disputed information, the verification discussion, and any documentation gathered so far, pending further evidence.
Do not re-add this information to the article without also submitting proof that it meets Wiktionary's criteria for inclusion.

---

Commons

In the sense of WikiMedia. Out of context should suffice, no? DAVilla 17:40, 21 July 2011 (UTC)

Is it a brand? DCDuring TALK 18:12, 21 July 2011 (UTC)

I would highly doubt such a common word could carry a trademark. DAVilla 06:09, 22 July 2011 (UTC)

Had no citations, so: RFV-failed. - -sche (discuss) 03:19, 2 March 2012 (UTC)

RFD discussion: May 2019–January 2020

The following discussion has been moved from Wiktionary:Requests for deletion (permalink).

This discussion is no longer live and is left here as an archive. Please do not modify this conversation, but feel free to discuss its conclusions.

---

Commons

RFD for the specific UK and Canadian senses — the first sense should cover this for all Westminster systems. —Μετάknowledge^{discuss/deeds} 07:25, 19 May 2019 (UTC)

I think senses 1 & 2 can be merged, they are virtually the same. DonnanZ (talk) 09:45, 19 May 2019 (UTC)

Simply merge the three senses. I think only the UK and Canada call the lower House “the [House of] Commons”. Even simpler: define this as “Short for House of Commons”.  --Lambiam 19:43, 19 May 2019 (UTC)

This was resolved by merging the senses last July. - -sche (discuss) 22:07, 16 January 2020 (UTC)