Jump to content

Talk:Bondi

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wiktionary, the free dictionary
Latest comment: 17 years ago by Connel MacKenzie in topic RFC discussion: June 2007

The following information passed a request for deletion.

This discussion is no longer live and is left here as an archive. Please do not modify this conversation, but feel free to discuss its conclusions.


Bondi

[edit]

(Same reason for suggesting deletion as above.) -- Beobach972 16:09, 9 March 2007 (UTC)Reply

Keep, used attributivly as part of shoot through like a Bondi tram (which I just found out is already an entry here). Bondi is a major part of Sydney lifestyle, worthy of inclusion.--Dmol 16:22, 9 March 2007 (UTC)Reply

Ok. I withdraw this deletion nomination in light of the phrase shoot through like a Bondi tram. Keep Bondi. -- Beobach972 16:31, 9 March 2007 (UTC)Reply

Keep. Wiktionary is also a dictionary of place names and a translating dictionary. I put in a lot of leg-work finding and verifying the translations into Chinese, Japanese, and Korean. This is a much better reason to include a word in a dictionary than the silly "used attributively" nonsense which I've never seen used in any other dictionary. "Bondi" has no special attributive meaning in "to shoot through like a Bondi tram" - it's just part of the phrase. — Hippietrail 15:32, 10 March 2007 (UTC)Reply

Keep. See the discussion we are having the Beer parlour about CFI for names. One school of thought is that all place names belong in Wiktionary; these can all potentially be used attributively in any case. — Paul G 10:39, 18 March 2007 (UTC)Reply
Given the withdrawal of the deletion nomination, I'm removing the tag on the article (and I'm moving into it content from WP). --maf 12:38, 11 April 2007 (UTC)Reply


RFC discussion: June 2007

[edit]

The following discussion has been moved from Wiktionary:Requests for cleanup (permalink).

This discussion is no longer live and is left here as an archive. Please do not modify this conversation, but feel free to discuss its conclusions.


Tagged but not listed. --Connel MacKenzie 21:13, 3 June 2007 (UTC)Reply