Talk:Adam-teasing
Add topicLatest comment: 11 years ago by -sche in topic Adam teasing
Deletion discussion
[edit]
This entry has survived Wiktionary's verification process.
Please do not re-nominate for verification without comprehensive reasons for doing so.
Appears to be a protologism. —Μετάknowledgediscuss/deeds 07:45, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
- I can find a BGC cite dated 2002, although it's hyphenated as "Adam-teasing". --EncycloPetey (talk) 07:48, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
- Now cited. --EncycloPetey (talk) 08:01, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
- Thanks. Two out of your three cites use the hyphen. I think the alternate forms are OK as cites, but it appears the hyphen is more common, so we should move the entry to Adam-teasing. —Μετάknowledgediscuss/deeds 18:49, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
- I don't think we can make a call of "more common" on the basis of just three cites. --EncycloPetey (talk) 19:33, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
- RFV-passed, moved to "Adam-teasing". The hyphenated form is more common, even if only by one citation. - -sche (discuss) 01:27, 4 August 2013 (UTC)
- I don't think we can make a call of "more common" on the basis of just three cites. --EncycloPetey (talk) 19:33, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
- Thanks. Two out of your three cites use the hyphen. I think the alternate forms are OK as cites, but it appears the hyphen is more common, so we should move the entry to Adam-teasing. —Μετάknowledgediscuss/deeds 18:49, 5 January 2013 (UTC)