Talk:💩

RFV discussion: January–April 2015

The following information has failed Wiktionary's verification process (permalink).

Failure to be verified means that insufficient eligible citations of this usage have been found, and the entry therefore does not meet Wiktionary inclusion criteria at the present time. We have archived here the disputed information, the verification discussion, and any documentation gathered so far, pending further evidence.
Do not re-add this information to the article without also submitting proof that it meets Wiktionary's criteria for inclusion.

---

💩

[Placeholder for "bullshit" pun]

(Amusingly, when searching for this symbol with QQ, I get, among other things, a few calculus textbooks. Google Books API apparently considers this symbol equivalent to the string "DY". No such thing happens with regular b.g.c search, however.) — Keφr 11:57, 20 January 2015 (UTC)

• This strikes me as something more likely to be found on Usenet (Google Groups). How hard is it to enable QQ for such? QQ looks like a cool tool, though the documentation is not adequate for someone like me. It doesn't really SELL the tool. DCDuring TALK 16:15, 20 January 2015 (UTC)
  • Next to impossible, unfortunately. Google Groups Search does not offer a public JSON API. As for documentation, feel free to write something better… — Keφr 17:11, 20 January 2015 (UTC)
  • And I would agree if by "more likely" you meant "≥" instead of ">". Usenet has always struck me as somewhat traditionalist, so to speak — in this case, sticking to bare ASCII (or at the very least characters you can type on a keyboard without looking them up in a character table) unless there is a necessity to do otherwise. — Keφr 17:20, 20 January 2015 (UTC)
    • If I understood QQ I could document it. Unfortunately the lack of documentation prevents me.
    • I thought that the image would be the kind of thing that someone would like to be able to produce as a comment on someone else's post. DCDuring TALK 11:52, 21 January 2015 (UTC)
      • There is little to be understood. Just enable it and try it out. — Keφr 17:18, 21 January 2015 (UTC)
        • Not related to the discussion but the symbol has a smile (eyes and mouth) when viewed on an iPad but there's no smile on PC. --Anatoli T. ^{(обсудить}/^вклад) 21:37, 21 January 2015 (UTC)
          • Probably a matter of which font is used by each. Chuck Entz (talk) 02:10, 22 January 2015 (UTC)

• RFV failed. —Mr. Granger (talk • contribs) 12:45, 25 April 2015 (UTC)