Talk:๐ง๐ณ๐ก๐๐๐บ๐ญ๐
Add topicLatest comment: 6 years ago by DerekWinters
@AryamanA Hey! Can you move this to Brahmi? I'm not sure exactly how it'd go or I'd do it myself. DerekWinters (talk) 19:10, 22 June 2018 (UTC)
- @DerekWinters: So it should be ๐ง๐๐ก๐๐๐บ๐ญ๐ (peแนแนญir)? โAryamanA (เคฎเฅเคเคธเฅ เคฌเคพเคค เคเคฐเฅเค โข เคฏเฅเคเคฆเคพเคจ) 21:13, 22 June 2018 (UTC)
- @AryamanA: I just read this: 1. Check page 7. We should also include that in the Brahmi transliteration module, but I'm not sure how to. DerekWinters (talk) 15:44, 27 June 2018 (UTC)
- @DerekWinters: Ugh, the competing standards are going to make Old Tamil entries difficult to make. I will move this entry back to the Tamil form for now since it's the only affected entry. I think we should wait for the pulli diacritic to be added to Unicode first before making Brahmi-script entries. โAryamanA (เคฎเฅเคเคธเฅ เคฌเคพเคค เคเคฐเฅเค โข เคฏเฅเคเคฆเคพเคจ) 02:16, 28 June 2018 (UTC)
- @AryamanA: I think the pulli is just the same as the virama. So wouldn't it take the form of ๐ง๐๐ ๐ก๐๐๐บ๐ญ๐ (pฤ แนแนญir) (I don't know how to ZWNJs). DerekWinters (talk) 23:20, 28 June 2018 (UTC)
- @DerekWinters: Ugh, the competing standards are going to make Old Tamil entries difficult to make. I will move this entry back to the Tamil form for now since it's the only affected entry. I think we should wait for the pulli diacritic to be added to Unicode first before making Brahmi-script entries. โAryamanA (เคฎเฅเคเคธเฅ เคฌเคพเคค เคเคฐเฅเค โข เคฏเฅเคเคฆเคพเคจ) 02:16, 28 June 2018 (UTC)
- @AryamanA: I just read this: 1. Check page 7. We should also include that in the Brahmi transliteration module, but I'm not sure how to. DerekWinters (talk) 15:44, 27 June 2018 (UTC)