Talk:부정적

@Wyang Hi Frank. The revised transcription shows "bujeongjeok" but transliteration "būjeongjeog". Shouldn't the vowel length be indicated in the transcription instead? The automated transliteration with macrons and other ambiguities will require the transliteration module to read entries, just like with Thai, won't it? --Anatoli T. ^{(обсудить}/^вклад) 03:38, 19 June 2016 (UTC)

Good point Anatoli. I will drop it in WT-revised RR then. RR doesn't indicate length in its romanisation. Wyang (talk) 03:42, 19 June 2016 (UTC)

Thanks, Frank. I wouldn't mind if the length is indicated in our transliterations, if such an amendment is agreeable to you and others. It's OK if the RR standard forbids it. --Anatoli T. ^{(обсудить}/^вклад) 03:46, 19 June 2016 (UTC)