Talk:追い払う

@Suzukaze-c, Eirikr Should the "alternative forms" section include both alternative spellings (追払う, 追いはらう) and sound shape variation (おっぱらう)? If so, I think it makes more sense to use the kana spelling as the lemma entry of wago terms:

==Japanese==
===Alternative forms===
* (more emphatic) おっぱらう (追払, ​opparau)

===Verb===
おいはらう【追払】 (transitive, godan conjugation, rōmaji oiharau, historical hiragana おひはらふ)

# to drive away and get rid of

Spelling issues can use a similar approach to {{zh-forms}}:

                                                         | kun'yomi お.い | kun'yomi はら.う |
  modern kana, shinjitai (追い払う/追払う/追いはらう)    |  追 (Grade: 3) |   払 (Grade: S)  |
historical kana, shinjitai (追ひ払ふ/追払ふ/追ひはらふ)  |       〃       |        〃        |
historical kana, kyujitai (追ひ拂ふ/追拂ふ/追ひはらふ)   |       〃       |   拂 (Jinmeiyō)  |

What do you think of this approach? --Dine2016 (talk) 04:09, 18 June 2018 (UTC)

I consider sound shape variation an alternative form. Alternative spellings are also alternative forms.

A {{zh-forms}}-like approach could be interesting. —Suzukaze-c◇◇ 04:16, 18 June 2018 (UTC)