Talk:越國

The following information passed a request for deletion.

This discussion is no longer live and is left here as an archive. Please do not modify this conversation, but feel free to discuss its conclusions.

---

越國

Wiktionary is not a place for, well, names of places. The user who created this solely did it for the purpose of linking to it from Wikipedia, which is inappropriate according to WP policies anyway. 75.79.43.199 23:39, 20 March 2009 (UTC)

Certainly we want place names. Besides, it was not linked to Wikipedia until I just now did so. Without a dictionary entry, students of Chinese cannot read and understand a text containing this word. This is the only place that gives the pronunciation, meaning, meaning of each character, and dignation as simplified or traditional. Keep. —Stephen 00:57, 21 March 2009 (UTC)

Keep. All words in all languages. We have hundreds of place names and need them for translantions. (For the record, I actually think that every place name on earth is valid for inclusion, certainly down to the city size at least)--Dmol 01:05, 21 March 2009 (UTC)

Keep. Not making a judgment as to "all place names", but this is a state-level entity. Definitely include all of those. bd2412 T 02:08, 21 March 2009 (UTC)

Keep While I have my reservations about placenames in general, I agree that state level placenames deserve entries. -Atelaes λάλει ἐμοί 04:42, 21 March 2009 (UTC)

Strong keep per unwritten rules. States and provinces (at the very least) are included. Once an entry is valid it will always be valid for all time. 63.95.64.254 02:39, 24 March 2009 (UTC)

Keep per Dmol. I don't believe that we should have entries for every placename, but we should have some for the bigger cities :P. Cheers, Razorflame 14:24, 26 March 2009 (UTC)

Keep for the reasons cited above. Mglovesfun 23:45, 27 March 2009 (UTC)

Kept. 63.95.64.254 23:59, 30 March 2009 (UTC)