Talk:硴
The following discussion has been moved from Wiktionary:Requests for cleanup (permalink).
This discussion is no longer live and is left here as an archive. Please do not modify this conversation, but feel free to discuss its conclusions.
A bit confused, this one. There's an RFE for Japanese in the Translingual section, and the Japanese marks the character as a kokuji or "Japanese-only", making it very unlikely that there should even be a Translingual section in the first place. Can anyone can find non-Japanese use of this character? -- Eiríkr Útlendi | Tala við mig 18:17, 26 August 2011 (UTC)
The following discussion has been moved from Wiktionary:Requests for cleanup (permalink).
This discussion is no longer live and is left here as an archive. Please do not modify this conversation, but feel free to discuss its conclusions.
An explicitly Japanese-only creation, which another user insists should nonetheless have a Translingual section. Previously RFCed by User:Eirikr for that reason. - -sche (discuss) 16:30, 15 June 2018 (UTC)
- @Zcreator alt -- Please see Talk:硴. If this character is actually used in any other language than Japanese, I'm happy to have a
==Translingual==section included. However, if this character is only used in Japanese, its usage is by definition not translingual. ‑‑ Eiríkr Útlendi │Tala við mig 20:33, 15 June 2018 (UTC)- They're plenty of Chinese-only characters (e.g. Mainland-coined simplified characters), but nevertheless they all have a Translingual section. It provides radical, strokes and IDS data can not be found elsewhere.--Zcreator alt (talk) 20:39, 15 June 2018 (UTC)
- ^this. —Suzukaze-c◇◇ 20:45, 15 June 2018 (UTC)
- Why not put that information in the Japanese section, though? - -sche (discuss) 21:48, 15 June 2018 (UTC)
- The data there is pretty "translingual" most of the time. —Suzukaze-c◇◇ 23:25, 15 June 2018 (UTC)
- Does the indicated Cangjie input for this character actually work in a Chinese IME? That could be viewed as evidence of translinguality. ‑‑ Eiríkr Útlendi │Tala við mig 23:45, 15 June 2018 (UTC)
- The data there is pretty "translingual" most of the time. —Suzukaze-c◇◇ 23:25, 15 June 2018 (UTC)
- Why not put that information in the Japanese section, though? - -sche (discuss) 21:48, 15 June 2018 (UTC)
- ^this. —Suzukaze-c◇◇ 20:45, 15 June 2018 (UTC)
- They're plenty of Chinese-only characters (e.g. Mainland-coined simplified characters), but nevertheless they all have a Translingual section. It provides radical, strokes and IDS data can not be found elsewhere.--Zcreator alt (talk) 20:39, 15 June 2018 (UTC)
RFC-resolved in diff. --Fytcha (talk) 17:30, 13 December 2021 (UTC)