Talk:やつれた

RFD

The following information passed a request for deletion.

This discussion is no longer live and is left here as an archive. Please do not modify this conversation, but feel free to discuss its conclusions.

---

やつれた

Tagged but not listed -- Liliana • 01:31, 21 October 2011 (UTC)

• I think Wiktionary takes verb forms so I've converted it into an entry for the past tense of やつれる / yatsureru. I doubt that the formatting is right. Fugyoo 01:47, 21 October 2011 (UTC)

The word is valid, just needs to be formatted properly. See みた and 見た as good examples. --Anatoli 02:04, 21 October 2011 (UTC)

delete this and all other entries from gibberish languages of the orient.Acdcrocks 02:38, 21 October 2011 (UTC)

Do you mean it what you just said? --Anatoli 02:42, 21 October 2011 (UTC)

Is this the same Acdcrocks who thinks we should include everything? Mglovesfun (talk) 11:07, 21 October 2011 (UTC)

Anyway, apparently we don't include Japanese verb forms even when they're erm, valid. But since I think that's a bad practice I think we should keep this. Mglovesfun (talk) 11:11, 21 October 2011 (UTC)

@Acdcrocks - I'm not sure if you're trolling, flamebaiting, or just being a bigot, but any of these behaviors do nothing to advance your case for being allowed to participate here. I'm hoping that either your account was "borrowed" or that you've had a momentary lapse of good judgement.

@Mglovesfun - Is that a policy I missed, and if so could you point me to the relevant page? I was under the impression that almost all word forms were welcome... -- Eiríkr Útlendi │ Tala við mig 19:53, 22 October 2011 (UTC)

Sorry I was mistaken when I put that up. I don't know where I got that idea. Anyway Keep. Somebody can remove the RFD tag I think--should I do that? Maybe there should be a blurb in AJA about how to format verb forms? I use Template:conjugation_of and I discovered Category:Japanese_form-of_templates but never use them--no doc. Not many pages use them either. Template:ja-past of verb is used on 3 pages, and Template:ja-te form of verb is used for two terms. 見た which Anatoli cited puts the form information in the etymology, which is different--both ways are ok? Which is better? How about putting it in the etymology for the lemma page and using Template:conjugation_of for kana/romaji links to the lemma page? Haplology 07:03, 23 October 2011 (UTC)

I notice that 見た has a translation and example sentences but verb forms in other languages usually just say "past tense of X" or whatever. Maybe because they are all made by bot? or is there a policy? Fugyoo 19:59, 23 October 2011 (UTC)

The translation shouldn't be there, if anything, it should be of the lemma form. Fixed and removed the tag. --Anatoli 22:20, 23 October 2011 (UTC)

Kept. --Anatoli 01:25, 10 November 2011 (UTC)