Talk:まじ卍
Add topicLatest comment: 2 years ago by Fish bowl in topic RFV discussion: May 2018–April 2022
The following information has failed Wiktionary's verification process (permalink).
Failure to be verified means that insufficient eligible citations of this usage have been found, and the entry therefore does not meet Wiktionary inclusion criteria at the present time. We have archived here the disputed information, the verification discussion, and any documentation gathered so far, pending further evidence.
Do not re-add this information to the article without also submitting proof that it meets Wiktionary's criteria for inclusion.
A hot word, tagged as being older than a year, with no definition. - -sche (discuss) 18:46, 11 May 2018 (UTC)
- I remember seeing a report that it became popular to use the manji (卍) in Japan's youth recently. There's even a manji gesture which consists of crossing your arms in some manner. The included Wikipedia article says it's a symbol for hype and basically means 'awesome', but I can't read the details. First reference (Kotobank) on Wikipedia says it's a compound of 'まじ' (really) and '卍' (cool) and got some media attention. I think kotobank.jp was used as an acceptable source for verification here before, but I don't know our policies. I added a definition at 卍. Korn [kʰũːɘ̃n] (talk) 08:21, 12 May 2018 (UTC)
- I've added two examples of slang usage in online advertisements. The examples are about two years apart, so I don't think it is a hot word. There is also a lot of mention on the web or in magazines explaining the usage. Cnilep (talk) 02:20, 22 March 2020 (UTC)
- @Cnilep, there are only 2 cites (out of 3) for the adjective and only 1 for the noun. — surjection ⟨??⟩ 11:03, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
- Sorry, didn't realize this was all on me. I added another adjective, but there's still just one for the noun. Cnilep (talk) 00:07, 9 February 2021 (UTC)
- Since the adjective seems to be cited, I've moved the RFV for the noun. If there aren't any more cites to be found for that one, I'll get around to deleting it eventually. — surjection ⟨??⟩ 20:06, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
- Sorry, didn't realize this was all on me. I added another adjective, but there's still just one for the noun. Cnilep (talk) 00:07, 9 February 2021 (UTC)
- @Cnilep, there are only 2 cites (out of 3) for the adjective and only 1 for the noun. — surjection ⟨??⟩ 11:03, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
- I've added two examples of slang usage in online advertisements. The examples are about two years apart, so I don't think it is a hot word. There is also a lot of mention on the web or in magazines explaining the usage. Cnilep (talk) 02:20, 22 March 2020 (UTC)
- Adjective RFV passed / Noun RFV failed —Fish bowl (talk) 02:49, 1 April 2022 (UTC)