Talk:প্রেমিক
Add topicAppearance
Latest comment: 3 years ago by Svartava2 in topic Sanskritic "compound"
Sanskritic "compound"
[edit]Inqilābī, how is it a compound when one of the components is a suffix? Note that {{com}}
also doesn't add suf(/pre)fix cats. Svārtava2 • 15:56, 17 September 2021 (UTC)
- @Svartava2, Bhagadatta: I think ’twould be better if
{{sa-com}}
accommodates affixes as well. In Sanskritic formations in contemporary NIA languages, prefixes and suffixes are very productive elements: for instance, Bengali uses the affixes সম- (śom-), -ইক (-ik), -তা (-ta), -ত্ব (-ttô), -কারী (-kari), -কামী (-kami), etc. to form Sanskritic compounds. Therefore, it would make more sense if the usage of a hyphen with a word in the templet generates a category for Sanskritic compound as well as the specific prefix or suffix. ·~ dictátor·mundꟾ 13:43, 22 September 2021 (UTC)- @Inqilābī: Thanks for the reply. Yes I guess I would like that for words like प्रमस्तिष्क (pramastiṣk). However, compound isn't the best possible term to be used here: note that
{{affix}}
, which can be used for categorisation by compound, doesn't categorise if there are dashes in any. Eg{{af|hi|प्र-|मस्तिष्क}}
= CAT:Hindi words prefixed with प्र-, not CAT:Hindi compound words. Svārtava2 • 14:22, 22 September 2021 (UTC)- @Svartava2: When I had proposed the creation of
{{sa-com}}
, what I had in mind was formation from tatsama elements, words, affixes, or whatever. So, to accommodate affixes, I guess the templet should be renamed to{{sa-af}}
; the text generation could be: ‘Sanskritic formation from X + Y’, where X, Y are tatsama words or affixes. ·~ dictátor·mundꟾ 14:37, 22 September 2021 (UTC)- @Svartava2: Nice!! Thanks. ·~ dictátor·mundꟾ 14:54, 22 September 2021 (UTC)
- @Inqilābī I added the word coined to emphasise that these are certainly not borrowings from Sanskrit. Svārtava2 • 15:11, 22 September 2021 (UTC)
- @Svartava2: I agree with that change; but no need to bold the word… ·~ dictátor·mundꟾ 15:27, 22 September 2021 (UTC)
- @Inqilābī I added the word coined to emphasise that these are certainly not borrowings from Sanskrit. Svārtava2 • 15:11, 22 September 2021 (UTC)
- @Svartava2: Nice!! Thanks. ·~ dictátor·mundꟾ 14:54, 22 September 2021 (UTC)
- @Svartava2: When I had proposed the creation of
- @Inqilābī: Thanks for the reply. Yes I guess I would like that for words like प्रमस्तिष्क (pramastiṣk). However, compound isn't the best possible term to be used here: note that
yea ok. Fixed. —Svārtava2 • 03:41, 23 September 2021 (UTC)