Talk:जीवविज्ञान
Add topicLatest comment: 9 years ago by Aryamanarora
@Aryamanarora, there seems to an issue with inconsistent transliteration between the headword and the etymology... — This unsigned comment was added by Metaknowledge (talk • contribs).
- (you forgot to sign, Metaknowledge) Yep, I'll fix it in a sec. It's just because we use IAST for Hindi, which transliterates ज्ञ as jñ, when it's supposed to be pronounced [gj] in Hindi. —Aryamanarora (मुझसे बात करो) 02:34, 14 December 2015 (UTC)
- @Aryamanarora: Ah, thanks. Maybe we should have that be an exception from IAST? It could be coded in the module, no? —Μετάknowledgediscuss/deeds 03:36, 14 December 2015 (UTC)
- It could be, but technically speaking, ज्ञ is an irregular ligature of ज (j) and ञ (ñ), so... —Aryamanarora (मुझसे बात करो) 12:31, 14 December 2015 (UTC)
- @Aryamanarora: Ah, thanks. Maybe we should have that be an exception from IAST? It could be coded in the module, no? —Μετάknowledgediscuss/deeds 03:36, 14 December 2015 (UTC)