Talk:سقرلات

RFV discussion: August–November 2016

The following information has failed Wiktionary's verification process (permalink).

Failure to be verified means that insufficient eligible citations of this usage have been found, and the entry therefore does not meet Wiktionary inclusion criteria at the present time. We have archived here the disputed information, the verification discussion, and any documentation gathered so far, pending further evidence.
Do not re-add this information to the article without also submitting proof that it meets Wiktionary's criteria for inclusion.

---

سقرلات

Tagged but not listed. DTLHS (talk) 05:30, 12 August 2016 (UTC)

I'm no expert on this language, but this entry needs to be cleaned up immediately, regardless of whether it stays or goes. We shouldn't have entries that aren't the proper format. I'm surprised this didn't get speedied or immediately cleaned up by now. Philmonte101 (talk) 06:12, 12 August 2016 (UTC)

If I wanted to look this word up, I wouldn't care very much if it was properly formatted or not. Siuenti (talk) 17:59, 12 August 2016 (UTC)

But the entry layout is mandatory here. This isn't an encyclopedia. It has to have the proper sections. Philmonte101 (talk) 19:23, 12 August 2016 (UTC)

• RFV failed. —Granger (talk · contribs) 16:38, 17 November 2016 (UTC)