Talk:קדשנו

The following information passed a request for deletion.

This discussion is no longer live and is left here as an archive. Please do not modify this conversation, but feel free to discuss its conclusions.

---

קדשנו

This isn't a lexeme; it's one of many verbal forms that the root q-d-sh can produce. Shai 14:06, 23 April 2007 (UTC)

You're right, but unlike traditional dictionaries, Wiktionary strives to include all words, including conjugated forms of verbs. At Wiktionary:About Hebrew, we've decided — this isn't set in stone yet, but a just-for-now decision, and you're welcome to bring this up there for further discussion — that direct-object-including verb forms should be included if and only if they're individually attested. קדשנו is obviously quite well attested, as it's part of a stock phrase that appears in many Jewish blessings. (Whether or not you agree with this, I'd appreciate it if you could stick your head in at Wiktionary:About Hebrew; so far we have rather a shortage of informed opinions to wrangle over.) —Ruakh_TALK 14:39, 23 April 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for the explanation. Not only that I don't disagree, I actually like the idea very much. Shai 10:44, 26 April 2007 (UTC)