Talk:тѧжъкъ
Add topicLatest comment: 11 years ago by Ivan Štambuk in topic Request for verification
Request for verification
[edit]From тѧжъкъ at Wiktionary:Requests for verification:
The following discussion has been moved from Wiktionary:Requests for verification.
This discussion is no longer live and is left here as an archive. Please do not modify this conversation, but feel free to discuss its conclusions.
Is this a spelling mistake or did this word really have ъ after ж? This combination was not normally allowed in OCS words. —CodeCat 17:53, 20 September 2013 (UTC)
- We do also have тѧжькъ. Ivan created them both, in less than three weeks of each other. —Aɴɢʀ (talk) 18:13, 20 September 2013 (UTC)
- Ivan is in the habit of creating many entries that are copies of each other, apparently because he thinks that calling something an "alternative spelling" is POV, or something like that. —CodeCat 18:29, 20 September 2013 (UTC)
- If you're referring to the Glagolitic script equivalents of Cyrillic OCS entries, yes it's a pretty big POV to have them redirected to Cyrillic. --Ivan Štambuk (talk) 03:04, 21 September 2013 (UTC)
- Ivan is in the habit of creating many entries that are copies of each other, apparently because he thinks that calling something an "alternative spelling" is POV, or something like that. —CodeCat 18:29, 20 September 2013 (UTC)
- Yes it's a spelling mistake, but not by me, but the scribe who copied Codex Marianus. Quote added and tag removed. --Ivan Štambuk (talk) 03:04, 21 September 2013 (UTC)