Talk:имать

(Notifying Atitarev, Cinemantique, KoreanQuoter, Useigor, Wanjuscha, Wikitiki89, Stephen G. Brown, Per utramque cavernam, Guldrelokk): Anatoli et al., can you check this entry, esp. the list of derived verbs (do all these forms exist, and do they line up pf/impf as indicated)? I got the list of derived verbs by looking in ruwikt; Zaliznyak is unfortunately of little or no help here because he doesn't generally include archaic words. Benwing2 (talk) 23:22, 18 October 2018 (UTC)

@Benwing2: Thanks. I'll have a better look later when I have more time. It could be on the weekend. --Anatoli T. ^{(обсудить}/^вклад) 23:47, 18 October 2018 (UTC)

Note: I moved the derived terms under ять (jatʹ), which is etymologically more basic, but the same concerns apply. Benwing2 (talk) 23:50, 18 October 2018 (UTC)

@Benwing2: I think the list is good but note that many modern derivations of "имать" don't follow the 6a conjugation pattern. --Anatoli T. ^{(обсудить}/^вклад) 13:44, 20 October 2018 (UTC)

@Atitarev Thanks. What about приима́ть (priimátʹ), восприима́ть (vospriimátʹ), предприима́ть (predpriimátʹ)? I created them all, and they're all archaic, so I guessed that they do follow the 6a pattern. Benwing2 (talk) 16:33, 20 October 2018 (UTC)

@Benwing2: Hi. Sorry for the long delay. They seem to be OK but they may be barely attestable.