Talk:ангельску
Latest comment: 1 year ago by Atitarev in topic RFD discussion: July–September 2022
The following information passed a request for deletion (permalink).
This discussion is no longer live and is left here as an archive. Please do not modify this conversation, but feel free to discuss its conclusions.
Rfd-redundant. Since the usage is only as a part of па-ангельску, should ангельску be kept as a separate item? -- Jarash (talk) 08:39, 7 July 2022 (UTC)
- No, it is there to make it clear to manaman whoso asks himself and searches that it is only used as part of that expression, so it is hardly even an item, but a redirect. Fay Freak (talk) 12:02, 7 July 2022 (UTC)
- @Jarash, Fay Freak: There is nothing redundant here. Originally I had to create a few similar Russian entries to cater for allowed situations like "Я говорю по-английски, немецки, французски" ("I speak English, German, French") instead of "Я говорю по-английски, по-немецки, по-французски.". In the first example the prefix по- (po-) can be dropped to avoid repetitions. Belarusians works the same way in such cases. As @Fay Freak explained, it is simply a soft-redirect to a lemma and proper form. --Anatoli T. (обсудить/вклад) 05:00, 8 July 2022 (UTC)
- Kept. --Anatoli T. (обсудить/вклад) 00:14, 9 September 2022 (UTC)
- @Jarash, Fay Freak: There is nothing redundant here. Originally I had to create a few similar Russian entries to cater for allowed situations like "Я говорю по-английски, немецки, французски" ("I speak English, German, French") instead of "Я говорю по-английски, по-немецки, по-французски.". In the first example the prefix по- (po-) can be dropped to avoid repetitions. Belarusians works the same way in such cases. As @Fay Freak explained, it is simply a soft-redirect to a lemma and proper form. --Anatoli T. (обсудить/вклад) 05:00, 8 July 2022 (UTC)