Talk:știință socială
Searching in Google:
Știință socială: 683.000 /// https://www.google.de/search?q=stiin%C8%9B%C4%83+social%C4%83&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8&gws_rd=cr&ei=TXWKVrZDzKWyAcK8qogB
Științe sociale: 450.000 /// https://www.google.de/search?q=stiin%C8%9Be+sociale&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8&gws_rd=cr&ei=XXSKVpWeOMuOsgH61pCAAQ
BAICAN XXX (talk) 12:59, 4 January 2016 (UTC)
- I don't know how you use Google Baican, but here are the results from Romanian Google:
- Please read this article as well. --Robbie SWE (talk) 13:24, 4 January 2016 (UTC)
- PS: even your source gives another number than the one you posted.DS
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/d/d5/TK_archive_icon.svg/55px-TK_archive_icon.svg.png)
The following discussion has been moved from Wiktionary:Requests for verification (permalink).
This discussion is no longer live and is left here as an archive. Please do not modify this conversation, but feel free to discuss its conclusions.
I moved this page because the most common form is in the plural, just like in other Romance languages. A Google search and the Romanian Wikipedia article on this subject support this renaming. However, the creator of the article, keeps reverting my edits and since I want to avoid a prolonged edit war, I want to raise the question here. --Robbie SWE (talk) 13:33, 4 January 2016 (UTC)
- It does seem to be a matter of procedure rather than attestation. Just because something is usually in the plural doesn't mean we can't have the main entry at the singular. Renard Migrant (talk) 18:21, 6 January 2016 (UTC)
- I've added social#Romanian by the way. Renard Migrant (talk) 10:08, 7 January 2016 (UTC)
- Striking. As far as I can tell, no one is disputing the existence of the term, only the best way to organize the entries, so this is not an RFV issue. —Mr. Granger (talk • contribs) 17:48, 1 July 2016 (UTC)