Talk:ć
Add topicLatest comment: 13 years ago by Ruakh in topic RFV discussion
RFV discussion
[edit]
The following information has failed Wiktionary's verification process.
Failure to be verified means that insufficient eligible citations of this usage have been found, and the entry therefore does not meet Wiktionary inclusion criteria at the present time. We have archived here the disputed information, the verification discussion, and any documentation gathered so far, pending further evidence.
Do not re-add this information to the article without also submitting proof that it meets Wiktionary's criteria for inclusion.
Never seen this in any texts. May be yet another "invention" by Omniglot. -- Prince Kassad 19:12, 29 October 2010 (UTC)
- What exactly is the problem? The letter exists at least in Polish and Croatian and apparently in Latin script of Serbian. Translingual appears bit weird to me. Can a letter which exists in only a small number of languages be Translingual? --Hekaheka 15:57, 30 October 2010 (UTC)
- Sure, why not? Mglovesfun (talk) 16:05, 30 October 2010 (UTC)
- Re: "What exactly is the problem?": note that the
{{rfv}}tag is in the ==Cimbrian== language section. So presumably, the problem is with the claim that this follows "c" and precedes "d" in the Cimbrian alphabet — or, more generally (judging by Prince Kassad's first comment here), with any claim that this letter is used in Cimbrian writing. —RuakhTALK 17:08, 30 October 2010 (UTC)- Not directly related to this RFV, but I don't see the value of having individual language sections for letters - that's precisely what Translingual is for. mul stands for multiple languages, when it's impractical to list them all. Mglovesfun (talk) 10:06, 31 October 2010 (UTC)
- I don't see the point in the translingual section; we can tell it's "The letter c with an acute accent." But knowing that it's used in Croatian and is pronounced /ʨ/, that's useful.--Prosfilaes 11:45, 31 October 2010 (UTC)
- According to this [1] source ć is the fifth letter of Cimbrian alphabet. --Hekaheka 10:35, 31 October 2010 (UTC)
- And if you note, that's exactly the site that Kassad was questioning in the first post.--Prosfilaes 11:45, 31 October 2010 (UTC)
- Not directly related to this RFV, but I don't see the value of having individual language sections for letters - that's precisely what Translingual is for. mul stands for multiple languages, when it's impractical to list them all. Mglovesfun (talk) 10:06, 31 October 2010 (UTC)
RFV failed, ==Cimbrian== section removed. —RuakhTALK 04:10, 1 February 2011 (UTC)