Reconstruction talk:Proto-Slavic/golъ

@CodeCat Why did you revert? The change does look wrong but the PIE page for *kalw- lists this adjective on it. Benwing2 (talk) 02:20, 24 March 2017 (UTC)

See WT:Etymology scriptorium/2017/March#Reconstruction:Proto-Indo-European/kalw-. —Μετάknowledge^{discuss/deeds} 02:23, 24 March 2017 (UTC)

Relation to Reconstruction:Proto-Indo-European/gl̥h₁éys?

@Fay Freak, sorry for bothering you. Do you know what is the stance on the referred PIE term? I saw you've commented on its RFD discussion. Within the literature, Proto-Slavic *golъ is compared with descendants of this PIE term and I just removed these comparisons from the Etymology section. They don't sound particularly relevant for the pSl. reconstruction. Should I bring them back? Безименен (talk) 19:03, 11 March 2023 (UTC)