Reconstruction talk:Proto-Slavic/ǫzlъ

Old Church Slavonic

@Per utramque cavernam: the two forms ѫзлъ and вѫзлъ do not belong to Old Church Slavonic proper, but to the Serbian recension alone. Is it proper to list it as Old Church Slavonic and moreover derive the Bulgarian term from it? Guldrelokk (talk) 09:07, 27 March 2018 (UTC)

@Guldrelokk: My bad, I'm a bit mechanic. Is this better? --Per utramque cavernam (talk) 09:12, 27 March 2018 (UTC)

Sure, thanks. Guldrelokk (talk) 09:15, 27 March 2018 (UTC)